test of <img>

test messages for practice or testing the forum

Moderator: needmore

User avatar
bambooweb
Site Admin
Posts: 1583
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location info: 1
Bamboo Society Membership: ABS - America
Location: Zone 5 in WA State
Contact:

test of <img>

Post by bambooweb »

<img src="http://www.bambooweb.info/images/bamboo ... color4.jpg" alt="PHYLLOSTACHYS edulis 'Bicolor'">
User avatar
bambooweb
Site Admin
Posts: 1583
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location info: 1
Bamboo Society Membership: ABS - America
Location: Zone 5 in WA State
Contact:

another image test

Post by bambooweb »

User avatar
bambooweb
Site Admin
Posts: 1583
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location info: 1
Bamboo Society Membership: ABS - America
Location: Zone 5 in WA State
Contact:

Re: another image test

Post by bambooweb »

User avatar
Roy
Posts: 3285
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:15 pm
Location info: 6
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA,............Florida's SunCoast <Zone 9B-10A>

Re: another image test

Post by Roy »

This photo takes up about 75 percent of the width of my 17 inch monitor. For me, I just lost 25 percent of the value of my 17 inch monitor. From your results, more people are using a 19 inch monitor than any other size of monitor. That leaves them with about 50 percent screen usage for the image. Are we shooting for the smallest size are the current standard?

bambooweb wrote:<img src='http://www.bambooweb.info/resize_image3.php?image=http://www.bambooweb.info/images/bamboo/BPV963.jpg'>

Test of limiting size of photo to 600 pixels and link to original photo.
--------------------------
Roy Rogers
Southern Tampania de la Floridana Universidad (STFU)
STFU Motto: All Bamboos are not Created Equal; @ STFU, the Search Continues
**********
:wave: ROY'S BAMBOO LIST
User avatar
bambooweb
Site Admin
Posts: 1583
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location info: 1
Bamboo Society Membership: ABS - America
Location: Zone 5 in WA State
Contact:

Re: another image test

Post by bambooweb »

<img src='http://www.bambooweb.info/resize_image3.php?image=http://hometown.aol.co.uk/Mjjbuckley/Pbambusoides3.jpg'>

Test of limiting size of photo to 600 pixels and link to original photo.
Photo from off site!
User avatar
Roy
Posts: 3285
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:15 pm
Location info: 6
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA,............Florida's SunCoast <Zone 9B-10A>

Re: another image test

Post by Roy »

Hopefully my post won't appear twice. Somehow or another my post got lost somewhere on the www.
--------------------------------
Test of limiting size of photo to 600 pixels and link to original photo.
Photo from off site!
Now you are on to something!
bambooweb wrote:<img src='http://www.bambooweb.info/resize_image3.php?image=http://hometown.aol.co.uk/Mjjbuckley/Pbambusoides3.jpg'>

Test of limiting size of photo to 600 pixels and link to original photo.
Photo from off site!
--------------------------
Roy Rogers
Southern Tampania de la Floridana Universidad (STFU)
STFU Motto: All Bamboos are not Created Equal; @ STFU, the Search Continues
**********
:wave: ROY'S BAMBOO LIST
User avatar
bambooweb
Site Admin
Posts: 1583
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location info: 1
Bamboo Society Membership: ABS - America
Location: Zone 5 in WA State
Contact:

Re: another image test

Post by bambooweb »

Roy wrote:This photo takes up about 75 percent of the width of my 17 inch monitor. For me, I just lost 25 percent of the value of my 17 inch monitor. From your results, more people are using a 19 inch monitor than any other size of monitor. That leaves them with about 50 percent screen usage for the image. Are we shooting for the smallest size are the current standard?

Roy click on the photo for the full size photo.

Actually I want to make the size selectable from each users profile.

Bill
User avatar
Roy
Posts: 3285
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:15 pm
Location info: 6
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA,............Florida's SunCoast <Zone 9B-10A>

Re: another image test

Post by Roy »

bambooweb wrote:
Roy wrote:This photo takes up about 75 percent of the width of my 17 inch monitor. For me, I just lost 25 percent of the value of my 17 inch monitor. From your results, more people are using a 19 inch monitor than any other size of monitor. That leaves them with about 50 percent screen usage for the image. Are we shooting for the smallest size are the current standard?

Roy click on the photo for the full size photo.

Actually I want to make the size selectable from each users profile.

Bill

Now that would be ideal.
--------------------------
Roy Rogers
Southern Tampania de la Floridana Universidad (STFU)
STFU Motto: All Bamboos are not Created Equal; @ STFU, the Search Continues
**********
:wave: ROY'S BAMBOO LIST
User avatar
bambooweb
Site Admin
Posts: 1583
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location info: 1
Bamboo Society Membership: ABS - America
Location: Zone 5 in WA State
Contact:

Re: another image test

Post by bambooweb »

Thuja
Posts: 959
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 1:34 pm
Location info: 0
Location: Wisconsin, USA zone 4b;
1951: -37*F;
1996: -29*F;
2005: -10*F;
2006: -17*F;
2007: -17*F.

Re: another image test

Post by Thuja »

Roy wrote:This photo takes up about 75 percent of the width of my 17 inch monitor. For me, I just lost 25 percent of the value of my 17 inch monitor. From your results, more people are using a 19 inch monitor than any other size of monitor. That leaves them with about 50 percent screen usage for the image. Are we shooting for the smallest size are the current standard?
If I recall correctly tho, the most common screen resolution setting is 1024x768 and this is what determines what will fit on-screen, regardless of monitor size.

Anyway, Bill's fix is a great piece of work. It should help keep everybody happy, which isn't an easy thing to do. :D
--Mike
Image
User avatar
Roy
Posts: 3285
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:15 pm
Location info: 6
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA,............Florida's SunCoast <Zone 9B-10A>

Re: another image test

Post by Roy »

Thuja wrote:
Roy wrote:This photo takes up about 75 percent of the width of my 17 inch monitor. For me, I just lost 25 percent of the value of my 17 inch monitor. From your results, more people are using a 19 inch monitor than any other size of monitor. That leaves them with about 50 percent screen usage for the image. Are we shooting for the smallest size are the current standard?
If I recall correctly tho, the most common screen resolution setting is 1024x768 and this is what determines what will fit on-screen, regardless of monitor size.

Anyway, Bill's fix is a great piece of work. It should help keep everybody happy, which isn't an easy thing to do. :D
When I go to 1024 x 768 everything is so small I have a hard time reading the text or seeing any detail in the images.
--------------------------
Roy Rogers
Southern Tampania de la Floridana Universidad (STFU)
STFU Motto: All Bamboos are not Created Equal; @ STFU, the Search Continues
**********
:wave: ROY'S BAMBOO LIST
User avatar
Iowaboo
Posts: 3121
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:21 pm
Location info: 32
Location: West Iowa
Contact:

RE: test of <img>

Post by Iowaboo »

What happened to our test forum? People are actually running tests in here? :? Weird.
Thuja
Posts: 959
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 1:34 pm
Location info: 0
Location: Wisconsin, USA zone 4b;
1951: -37*F;
1996: -29*F;
2005: -10*F;
2006: -17*F;
2007: -17*F.

RE: test of <img>

Post by Thuja »

Testing, testing... 1, 2, 3, 4. Can anyone hear me?

For $800, I see a 37" monitor, 1366x768 pixels. Sit back a little ways, and that might do the trick.
--Mike
Image
serenityinbamboo
Posts: 563
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 12:05 am
Location info: 0
Location: We live on 5 acres in Florida Zone 8b.

RE: test of <img>

Post by serenityinbamboo »

I like it, I like it!!!!!
User avatar
Iowaboo
Posts: 3121
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:21 pm
Location info: 32
Location: West Iowa
Contact:

RE: test of <img>

Post by Iowaboo »

For $800, I see a 37" monitor, 1366x768 pixels. Sit back a little ways, and that might do the trick.
Is that similar to a walk in closet?
Post Reply